Statizoid

Freshwater Fish — Stock Variation in Latvia

Latvia: Freshwater Fish — Stock Variation was 0 1000 t in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
World rank
1st
of 86 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
-1 1000 t
in 2013
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Freshwater Fish — Stock Variation in Latvia, 2010–2023

-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-02010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: -1 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

In 2023, freshwater fish — stock variation in Latvia stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, freshwater fish — stock variation in Latvia peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, -1 1000 t, in 2013.

That places Latvia 1st out of 86 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s -0.1 1000 t -1 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 1 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  2. 1 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  3. 1 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  4. 1 Lesotho 0 1000 t compare
  5. 1 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  6. 1 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  7. 1 Mauritania 0 1000 t compare
  8. 1 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  9. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  10. 1 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  11. 1 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  12. 1 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  13. 1 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  14. 1 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  15. 1 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  16. 1 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  17. 1 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  18. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  19. 1 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  20. 1 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  21. 1 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  22. 1 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  23. 1 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  24. 1 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  25. 1 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  26. 1 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  27. 1 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  28. 1 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  29. 1 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  30. 1 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  31. 1 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  32. 1 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  33. 1 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  34. 1 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  35. 1 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  36. 1 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  37. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  38. 1 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  39. 1 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  40. 1 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  41. 1 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  42. 1 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  43. 1 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  44. 1 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  45. 1 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  46. 1 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  47. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  48. 1 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  49. 1 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  50. 1 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  51. 1 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  52. 1 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  53. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  54. 1 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  55. 1 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  56. 1 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  57. 1 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  58. 1 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  59. 1 Kazakhstan 0 1000 t compare
  60. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  61. 1 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  62. 1 France 0 1000 t compare
  63. 1 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 1 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  65. 1 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  66. 1 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  67. 1 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  68. 1 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  69. 1 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  70. 1 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  71. 1 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  72. 1 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  73. 1 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  74. 1 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  75. 1 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  76. 1 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  77. 1 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  78. 1 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  79. 1 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  80. 1 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  81. 1 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  82. 1 Caribbean 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 115 places →

More environment data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is freshwater fish — stock variation in Latvia?
Freshwater fish — stock variation in Latvia was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest freshwater fish — stock variation recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest freshwater fish — stock variation recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was -1 1000 t in 2013.
How does Latvia rank for freshwater fish — stock variation?
Latvia ranks 1st out of 86 countries with data for 2023.
Is freshwater fish — stock variation rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Freshwater Fish — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

About this data

Indicator
Freshwater Fish — Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
115 places, 1,538 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.